Skip to content
Time slots are limited. Secure your free discovery call.

Property, with perspective

When Median Prices Lie: Why a Falling Median Doesn’t Always Mean Property Prices Are Falling

Rokeby's median house price has declined in 3-month rolling terms, but the headline number hides what is actually happening underneath: a shift in the mix of what is selling, not a fall in value across the board.

Share this insight

If you own property in the Hobart suburb of Rokeby, or are considering buying there, the recent data might give you pause.

Rokeby’s median house price has declined in 3-month rolling median terms. At face value, that could suggest the market is softening: existing properties may be losing value, and prospective buyers may reasonably question whether this is the right time to enter.

Those are reasonable concerns. And rather than dismissing them with another statistic, we wanted to understand what was actually happening underneath the headline number.

Are comparable properties genuinely selling for less than they were six or twelve months ago? Or has the type and quality of properties being sold changed?

So, we went deeper into the data, and then into the individual properties behind it.

What was happening in Rokeby?

We started by stripping out some of the noise.

Rather than looking at every house sold in Rokeby, we examined three-bedroom houses on blocks between 500sqm and 900sqm over the previous 12 months.

We chose three-bedroom houses because they represented the overwhelming majority of house transactions in the suburb during the period, making them a useful proxy for the local market.

The distribution showed something interesting.

In late 2025 and early 2026, there was a noticeable concentration of properties selling between approximately $700,000 and $800,000.

More recently, transactions had become more concentrated around $600,000 to $700,000.

At first glance, that seems to confirm the falling median.

But then we looked at what was actually being sold .

The houses had changed, not necessarily their values

To understand what was driving the shift, we divided the sales into three groups.

Group 1 captures the higher-priced properties sold before May 2026. Group 2 captures the lower-priced properties sold from May onwards. And Group 3 captures lower-priced properties that had already been selling before May.

When we looked at the age of the properties in each group, a clear difference emerged.

Most homes in Group 1 were relatively new, with many built from around 2018 onwards. By contrast, Groups 2 and 3 were dominated by much older housing, particularly properties built during the 1970s.

That changes how we interpret the price distribution.

The lower prices seen recently weren’t new to Rokeby. Similar older properties had also been selling at the lower end of the market before the median started declining.

In fact, comparing Groups 2 and 3 tells a different story from the headline median. Recent sales of this older housing stock generally sit above the prices achieved by similar stock earlier in the period.

It doesn’t prove that every comparable property has increased in value. But it does suggest that the falling suburb median is being heavily influenced by which properties are selling , rather than providing clear evidence that like-for-like property values are falling.

But one sale made us look deeper

The difference in housing age provided a reasonable explanation for the shift in Rokeby’s median price. But one transaction stood out.

1 Bland Court , a three-bedroom house built in 1978, sold for $740,000 in January 2026 .

That caught our attention because its sale price sat alongside much newer properties in the higher-priced cluster.

If an older house could achieve around $740,000 earlier in the year, why were similar older properties no longer selling at those prices?

Could there still be some genuine price softening underneath the change in sales mix?

To test that, we searched the more recent transactions for the closest possible comparison to 1 Bland Court. Most of the older houses sold recently sat on substantially smaller blocks, making them poor comparables.

The closest we found was 4 Arden Place .

It was built in 1976, had three bedrooms and sat on approximately 743sqm, making it much closer to 1 Bland Court’s 883sqm than the other recent sales.

4 Arden Place sold for $631,000 in August 2026 .

Now we had an interesting comparison: two three-bedroom houses built only two years apart, both on relatively large blocks, selling seven months apart, but with a price difference of more than $100,000.

At first glance, that could look like evidence of falling property values.

So we inspected the properties themselves.

Even “comparable” properties may not be comparable

Both homes appeared to be in good condition, but the similarities started to disappear once we looked beyond bedrooms and construction year.

1 Bland Court sits on approximately 883sqm , compared with 743sqm at 4 Arden Place. It also has approximately 120sqm of internal space versus 99sqm , a two-car garage, and an elevated position with a nice view.

In other words, even our closest available comparison wasn’t truly like-for-like.

Could some market movement have contributed to the price difference? Maybe. Two individual sales can’t disprove it.

But the more we investigated, the harder it became to interpret the lower recent sale prices as evidence that equivalent Rokeby properties had simply fallen in value.

When the median “lies”

So, was Rokeby’s median price wrong?

No. The median was accurately reporting the middle sale price of the properties that transacted. What changed was the mix of properties being sold .

So it won’t be right to interpret a falling median as a signal that property values across the suburb have fallen by the same amount.

That’s why being data-driven shouldn’t mean blindly following a spreadsheet. Median prices are useful, but they are just one signal among many. Property age, condition, land size, location and the type of stock coming to market can all change the story behind the headline number.

That’s also why, at InvestorKit, our Research and Acquisitions teams work closely together. When the data says one thing but what we’re seeing on the ground suggests another, the discrepancy is worth investigating.

Sometimes it’s more important to ask why prices behave in a certain way than to ask how prices have changed. And answering the ‘why’ could lead to a very different investment conclusion.

If you want a property investment strategy built on deeper market research, rather than headline numbers alone, book a discovery call with InvestorKit and see how our Research, Strategy and Acquisitions teams can help with your next investment decision.

From insight to action.

Start with your goals, your current position and whether InvestorKit is the right fit for you.

A complimentary 15-minute discovery call.

Explore other insights