Skip to content
Black Friday Limited spots each week until 30 November Book a free call
New Build Property After the Budget: The Hidden Risks Investors Need to Understand artwork

Podcast episode

New Build Property After the Budget: The Hidden Risks Investors Need to Understand

The Property Nerds

With Arjun Paliwal & Jack Fouracre

About this episode

The Federal Budget has created a clear divide within the property market.

While many proposed tax changes impact established property investors, new build properties have largely retained their existing advantages.

On the surface, that may sound like good news.

But does greater tax incentive automatically create a better investment?

In this episode of the Property Nerds Podcast, Arjun Paliwal and Jack Fouracre took a deeper look at how the latest budget measures could influence new build property investing, why demand may surge toward certain property types, and the potential risks investors need to understand before following the crowd.

The discussion challenged the common assumption that tax benefits alone should drive investment decisions and highlighted why long-term wealth creation often comes down to fundamentals rather than incentives.

What Happened

This episode formed part two of the Property Nerds post-budget series, focusing specifically on new build property investing.

Arjun and Jack examined why new builds were largely excluded from proposed changes affecting negative gearing and capital gains tax treatment, and what that might mean for investor behaviour moving forward.

The conversation explored the economics of property development, how government incentives can influence demand, and why investors need to understand the difference between tax outcomes and investment outcomes.

Throughout the discussion, a recurring theme emerged: the best investment decisions are rarely made solely for tax reasons.

Key Findings

1. New build incentives could drive more investor demand

One of the most immediate impacts discussed during the episode was the likelihood that more investors will gravitate toward new build properties.

With established properties facing additional uncertainty while new builds remain largely untouched, many investors may view new construction as the safer option.

However, the panel highlighted that when large numbers of investors pursue the same opportunity, unintended consequences often follow.

Demand alone does not automatically create better investment outcomes.

2. Higher demand can push construction prices even higher

A major concern raised during the discussion was the impact increased demand could have on building costs.

If more investors rush toward new builds, developers and builders may face greater demand than they can efficiently supply.

Historically, increased demand often leads to higher prices.

The episode highlighted that investors may end up paying significantly more for the same product simply because tax incentives encourage larger numbers of buyers into the market.

In other words, some of the perceived tax benefits could be offset by higher acquisition costs.

3. Depreciation benefits do not guarantee wealth creation

One of the strongest messages from the episode was the distinction between tax savings and wealth creation.

Many new build investments are promoted heavily on the basis of depreciation benefits and negative gearing outcomes.

While these tax advantages can improve short-term cash flow, they do not automatically create long-term wealth.

The discussion reinforced that investors ultimately build wealth through capital growth, asset performance, and portfolio strategy rather than simply maximising deductions.

4. Developer incentives and investor incentives are not always aligned

The panel explored how developers benefit when demand increases.

If investors become increasingly motivated by tax outcomes, developers may gain greater pricing power, particularly in markets where supply is constrained.

While this can improve development feasibility and encourage new housing supply, it also means investors may be paying a premium for properties that have become more attractive because of policy settings rather than underlying market fundamentals.

Understanding who benefits most from a particular incentive is an important part of evaluating any investment opportunity.

5. Investor-heavy estates can create long-term challenges

A particularly important point focused on the composition of new housing estates.

When a large proportion of properties are purchased by investors, communities can become heavily reliant on rental demand rather than owner-occupier demand.

The episode highlighted several potential consequences:

  • Greater competition among landlords.

  • Increased vacancy risk.

  • Reduced rental pricing power.

  • Lower owner-occupier appeal.

  • Weaker resale demand.

Strong capital growth is often supported by owner-occupier demand, not just investor demand.

6. New builds can behave differently to established properties

The conversation compared new build properties to established housing markets.

Established properties often benefit from scarcity, existing infrastructure, mature communities, and a larger owner-occupier buyer pool.

By contrast, many new estates are competing against a continuous pipeline of future supply.

When buyers can purchase a brand-new equivalent product nearby, resale performance can become more challenging for existing owners.

The discussion highlighted why understanding supply dynamics is critical when evaluating new developments.

7. Housing affordability issues are more complex than taxation policy

The episode broadened into a larger discussion around Australia's housing challenges.

Arjun argued that housing affordability is influenced by multiple factors, including:

  • Population growth.

  • Housing supply.

  • Construction costs.

  • Taxation.

  • Infrastructure planning.

  • Migration.

  • Employment distribution.

The discussion suggested that focusing solely on investor taxation risks oversimplifying a far more complex issue.

8. Long-term wealth creation requires a broader strategy

Perhaps the most important takeaway from the episode was that successful investing requires a long-term perspective.

Tax incentives can be valuable.

Government policy matters.

But neither should become the sole basis for an investment decision.

The discussion reinforced that investors should focus on:

  • Supply and demand fundamentals.

  • Capital growth potential.

  • Lending strategy.

  • Cash flow management.

  • Portfolio construction.

  • Long-term wealth objectives.

Investment strategy should drive decisions, not tax incentives alone.

Action Steps

If you're considering investing in a new build property following the latest budget announcements, consider the following:

  • Look beyond tax incentives when evaluating investment opportunities.

  • Understand how increased demand may affect construction prices.

  • Assess supply levels within new estates and surrounding developments.

  • Consider the balance between owner-occupier and investor demand.

  • Focus on long-term capital growth potential rather than short-term deductions.

  • Evaluate the broader market fundamentals supporting the location.

  • Seek advice from lending, accounting, and property professionals before making decisions.

  • Build a strategy around your long-term financial goals rather than reacting to policy changes.

While new build properties may continue receiving favourable treatment under current policy settings, successful investing still comes back to fundamentals. Tax benefits may improve cash flow, but long-term wealth is typically created through strong assets, sound strategy, and disciplined decision-making.

If you'd like help building a property strategy that focuses on long-term wealth creation rather than short-term incentives, book a discovery call with InvestorKit.

Video chapters

  1. 0:00 - The lending urgency advantage in a low-sentiment market
  2. 0:36 - Welcome back to the Property Nerds Podcast: The Post-Budget Deep Dive
  3. 1:12 - Why property is a game of finance, not political opinion
  4. 2:06 - The CGT recalculation: Analysing the July 2027 revaluation event
  5. 3:41 - The new negative gearing rule: Tracking contract dates and deferred benefits
  6. 5:48 - Case Study: Racking up a $50,000 deferred tax buffer across 9 years
  7. 8:08 - The Trust Crackdown: Breaking down the 30% minimum distribution floor
  8. 9:14 - The 60% Corporate Tax Trap: Why parking profits in a company can trigger double taxation
  9. 10:10 - New Build Exemptions: The creation of a two-tiered property landscape
  10. 11:14 - Meet Jack Faraker: Why one major lender has already axed negative gearing math
  11. 13:30 - Calculating the damage: How policy adjustments can slash individual capacity by 30%
  12. 14:56 - The Three Levers: 40-year loan terms, buffer adjustments, and rental shading updates
  13. 17:46 - Exploiting the window: Why every major policy shock since 2018 was a buying opportunity
  14. 19:31 - The Delayed Swing: How affordable micro-markets will extend their growth runs
  15. 21:55 - The Clarity Horizon: Why legislation changes trigger the next aggressive market run
  16. 23:58 - Debt Exclusion Mechanics: Why trusts still crush company structures for non-business owners
  17. 26:42 - Business Owner Strategy: Utilising trading entity profits to backstop company assets
  18. 29:10 - The Decision Matrix: Step-by-step portfolio routes for entry, scaling, and wrap-up phases
  19. 33:54 - Action over inertia: Don't leave your current pre-approval lying around
  20. 34:51 - Final Warning: Review your positions with your accountant and your broker

Transcript

Read the full transcript

This transcript was generated automatically and may contain small errors.

The price to build, 40% of it is just tax. Your exposure to a depreciating construction build is just going down really fast. This is bad. This is actually really, really bad. Nerd alert!

Property nerds. The home for data-driven property investors. Where we uncover Australia's hot and cold markets, latest headlines and trends. Welcome back to another episode of the Property Nerds podcast. I'm Arjun Paliwal, CEO of InvestorKit.

I'm here with Jack Fouracre from Fouracre Financial, co-host on the show. And today is part two of our post-budget deep dive. And in this particular case, the budget deep dive, Jack, is focused on new build. Now, if you want to know the full changes of property specifics when it comes to trusts, new builds, CGT, negative gearing, in our interpretation of it, plus the lending-focused interpretation of it, wind back to the last episode. The last episode covers that and more, so you know exactly what information to take to your accountant from all things lending, all things structure, so you're lending-led, because lending-led equals property acquisition-led, and then you move over to tax decisions and structure.

People get it wrong all the time by flipping it, because all their feed is full of structure and tax and not lending and property. So go back to talk to your professionals and to understand what you do based on information made available so far and our interpretation of it. Again, it's not financial advice. It's the last episode that we had just before this one that you listened to or watching, and that was from budget part one. This is part two.

So Jack, we're going deep into the world of new builds, because unlike anything else, new build property investments remain unchanged from CGT, gearing, anything really, right? Why is that being done? And is it a good idea, firstly, in your opinion, from Treasury to even do that? So from my understanding, a lot of people are assuming that this is an attack on just established property, right? It's actually an attack on everyone, all assets, businesses.

It's just basically, it's not an attack on property, established property. It's just they've raised the taxes everywhere in any possible way they can, right? So that's something that we should just get straight from the get-go. This is not them trying to reduce the heat of the property market. They're just attacking all Australians by taxing everyone more, right?

Now, that's going to have some implications, but in relation to not changing it for established property, for brand new property, new builds, what they're trying to do is incentivize people to go down that path and invest in a brand new property, right? Now, we've already identified some issues with that. One of the, well, I'd say there's two major issues with that from our perspective. There's going to be a lot of clients get burnt from this, right? Now, if you're incentivizing people to purchase new build properties, what that basically is going to do, and the masses are going to do that, right?

The uninformed investors that don't listen to this podcast are going to do that. Now, what that's going to do is increase the demand of properties like that, and the industry is going to be under some pressure, right? What happens when that happens? Prices go up, right? Not the price of land, but the price to build, right?

The price to build, 40% of it is just tax, right? So, how's that going to go for your capital growth of your investment when your exposure to a depreciating construction build is just going down really fast? This is bad. This is actually really, really bad. I want everyone to understand how the world of property development works.

If you're sitting there thinking that property development is not working because these policies aren't there, you're right and wrong. You're wrong because the reason for property development not working right now for many developers is financial feasibility. Financial feasibility in simple terms means they're not making enough money, moolah. They're not making enough moolah. If they're not making enough, I don't care if they've got the land, they're not building it.

If they're not making enough, I don't care if it's Australia needs more supply, they're not building it. At the end of the day, it's privatized. So, a private investor who's taking risk and capital, subbies, builders, everything like that, they're going to have to have money to fork out and they have to make it. And they're on ice-thin margins for so many developments. And so, from that perspective, what that means is this is their golden ticket to financial feasibility because the uninformed investor is going to basically go, ooh, looky, I get tax advantages.

My accountant said go do this for tax because remember the accountant's goal is not for wealth building. Some are, but most accountants are measured on how much tax they save you. And I've never have someone just gotten rich and wealthy from someone going, I'm so wealthy because I negative geared my whole life through negative geared property. No, you're wealthy because capital growth had you wealthy. So, negative gear is just an outcome and you're trying to use this taxation policy and your accountant's guidance for that.

Problem here is big problem. The only way they're going to make it financial feasible, like you said, is so demand is very high. What happens in demand in any product, stuff housing for a minute, any product in this world, demand's high, you have two options. Increase prices to not have delivery chokehold so you can deliver at your same rate and take advantage of a market until they don't want to pay that number or can't pay that number. People's capability on negative gearing, people's capability on taxes, and people's numbers that they're willing and able from emotional control of their guidance from professionals telling them, hey, you can get negative gearing, look how much tax we save you, it won't cost you much, go do it.

Your prices are going to shoot up massively. For an extremely select few who maybe got in over the last few months pre-budget to register some land and they're waiting for it to build and everything, you might be okay. Unless contracts start changing their prices again and you might be stuffed. But everyone from here on out is going to start paying massive prices and prices are going to rapidly rise because people want your cash. The developer wants to earn money and rightfully so.

They tax the crap out of everything and they've got a ticket to building more supply and more supply is what the country needs too. But here's the problem. That supply is going to be just a bunch of uninformed investors. Jack, how many times have you had a desire to wake up one morning and go, wow, I can't wait to go to this new build area to buy my home and be the only home buyer on the street amongst nine investment property owners out of 10 properties on the street and these nine investment property owners didn't want to do anything extra on their street appeal, their landscaping, their finishes. They wanted the lowest, the cheapest option to get in which the developer pumped up.

And so I've got this one owner-occupier kind of looking, specced, a little bit adjusted design plans and stuff house and everyone's these nine copy-paste flat-pack bunning style homes. You bring up a great point and this is some foresight that you had immediately after the budget is that you've identified a trap, right? If you've got investors flocking to new builds, right? You've made a really good point. Investors make money when they sell, right?

When you go into this from trying to get tax advantages, a lot of other investors are doing the same thing, right? So the ratio from owner-occupiers to investors across the nation is, well, 70% owners. It's cooked on what's going to happen. But just for new builds, it's going to be more swayed to investors than it is for owner-occupiers and that's a problem for capital growth, right? But for the investors that buy for those incentives and then look to sell in 10 years, for someone who's going to buy that property, there's no incentives for that person.

It's no longer a new build. It's now an established property. This is literally the world of cars coming to property. You get in the car, you're like, look at me, ribbon, photo. It was already like that.

It's just exacerbated now because of the incentives and the masses that go and do it. It's a massive trap. You're going to go into that street. You're going to be one of that nine out of the 10 homes. It's going to be these renters in terms of the rental properties.

And these rental properties, they're going to be like, oh, hey, let me just sell this house because we're moving countries. Something normal. It's not even to make money. Like, oh, we're moving countries. Let me just sell.

Or we're moving cities. Let me just sell so we can buy this home to live in. Oh, yeah, yeah. You bought that property at 900, pumped construction prices because they're willing to pay trades, whatever, to fill this demand up. And they're needing to get these properties out so they want to charge more and make money.

They can't magically deliver more. So to deliver more, they're like, well, let me charge more to deliver as much as I can. And then I'll try and find the balance between delivery and charging more and make that margin. Now what will happen is you'll have this overpriced product that you pay for that was literally the same materials, the same just a few months ago, but the price has gone bam. Now all of a sudden you resell it.

You're moving countries. You're moving cities. And like you said, who are you selling it to? That owner-occupier story we just talked about?

More from this show

All The Property Nerds episodes